AustinS Aff. Side On Sanctions Essays - International Sanctions

Austin'S Aff. Side On Sanctions AUSTINS AFF. SIDE ON SANCTIONS Silence, who is a man who stands silent? Who is a man who doesnt stand up for what is right? That man is condoning the present activity. He is allowing the status quo to proceed. So what is the alternative? WAR, mass destruction, children lie dead in streets, mothers are killed, babies are left fir dead, home are burned, generations are wiped out. Millions are dead. Countries require decades to reconstruct, heal emotions and whatever good might arise out of all of these only follows years latter after emotions and hostilities are lifted. However being silent is just as deadly as going to war. But there is infect the middle ground to both of these. This middle ground to both of these terrible issues. A middle ground that doesnt require the lives, the money, and the sacrifices that a war might impose on this country or the rest of the world. This middle ground is ECONMIC SANCTIONS. This is why I affirm the resolution The value I hold for todays debate is very clear SAFTEY. At this tim e I do not feel it is nessary to define any terms at this moment, however if does become nessary I will do so at apporite time. I will defend the aff side with the following conts. SANCTIONS ARE THE BRIDIGE THAT ALLOWS NATIONS TO CROSS OVER WAR WITH OUT GOING. 2 WITH OUT SANCTIONS THE WORLD WOULD BE A WAR ZONE. 3 SANCTIONS ARE EFFECTIVE 1. Going into my first cont. I would like to set the goal of economies sanctions: from the journal of commerce in 1998 THE GOAL OF IS STRAIGHT FOWDARD TO HALT ROGUE BEHAVIOR BY HITTING THE TARGET COUNTRY WHERE IT HURTS THE MOST IN THE POCKETBOOK. Now lets go back to the days of the colonist in early America they embossed embargos on England after receiving the TOWNSEND ACTS and they worked, England was only able to comply with the Americans because they were holding their pocket book in their hand so they were helpless. Following this Madison AND Jefferson debated over forgein policy. Jefferson and Madison happened to come to almost the same conc. about forgien policy about sanctions MADISION 1embargo 2 war 3 submission and tribute. However Jefferson had a different idea. 1 diplomacy sanction and war. In Jeffersons words how can America deal with terrorists, proliferarors, and genocidal dictators? Our options would be empty talk and send in the marines. What Jefferson is trying to say is America needs away to be able to threaten terrorists, dictators etc. before they try to harm human life, the US needs away to to tell the worlds most deadly people that if they try things such as genoside or other wrong doings America will intervine to protect the welfare of life. Ex. nazi, Germany, Iraq, Kosho. All of these are prime examples that the US will intervene if such affiances occur. 2 WITHOUT SANCTIONS THE WORLD WOULD BE CONSTANTLY AT WAR. Now lets consider a world with out sanctions a world in which goes from diplomacy to war skipping the sanctions. How could America prevent dictators such a Saddam in Iraq from making VX gas and other biological and chemical weapons of warfare? Could we stop a man in Kosovo form killing many innocent people because they werent the right color or religion? The answer in no we would be in constant war or we would just sit by and allow the present activity to proceed as human life was taken innocently. And lets think, If we didnt intervene in Iraq where would the weapons be pointing this very day. Our allies Israel, Kuat, or in the worst scenario the United States of America. I dont know about you but that just doesnt settle good with dinner to think one day I could be out in the yard fit playing Frisbee and the next watching my naborhors house be blown up followed by mine form a ballistic missile driven by a man that hates everything to do with America. So I cant figure out how anyone t hinks that this could be immoral? 3 SANCTIONS ARE EFFECTIVE From the forgein affairs committee in Washington DC.

“Macbeth” and “Brave New World” Comparison Essay Essay Essay Example

â€Å"Macbeth† and â€Å"Brave New World† Comparison Essay Essay Essay Example â€Å"Macbeth† and â€Å"Brave New World† Comparison Essay Essay Essay â€Å"Macbeth† and â€Å"Brave New World† Comparison Essay Essay Essay Essay Topic: Brave New World Freedom and individuality are a important constituent of modern-day society. nevertheless there are many parts of the universe where these basic homo rights are non granted. The deficiency of these basic rights are clearly demonstrated in the novel Brave New World by Aldous Huxley and the drama Macbeth by William Shakespeare. The leaders of many societies are willing to give guiltless lives in order for society to work harmonizing to their visions. Many leaders are willing to give the freedom of the people in order for society to run the manner they want. Furthermore. even the persons doing up the society are rather willing to give their psyches in order to populate in an fanciful universe. Equally long as they perceive felicity to be present they are really content to populate at that place. To populate in the Utopian fanciful universes of Brave New World and Macbeth. freedom and individualism are frequently sacrificed. Sacrifice is frequently a necessity when trying to make Utopian societies. However. these forfeits are non plenty to convert every person within the society. One of these persons is Bernard. who was traveling to be exiled to Iceland by the manager. because he does non believe in the society that persons after Ford believed in. Even though Bernard was conditioned when he was a kid. he could non accept what all the other persons believed. Unlike the other persons. Bernard has stunted growing and frequently felt isolated from the remainder of society. Further estranging Bernard from the remainder of society is his rejection of the promiscuous nature nowadays in his society. He besides exhibits the assorted features of work forces who existed before Ford. Bernard Marx did non believe in the everyone belonged to everyone subject that was the norm in Fords society. The manager wanted to expatriate Bernard Marx because he did non believe in the society that the manager was implementing. However. Bernard felt strong plenty to run into and get the better of affliction. strong plenty to confront even Iceland. ( Huxley 106 ) . This outlook was one of the many factors which set Bernard apart from the remainder of society. Another adult male who sets himself apart from society is Macbeth. He plots and succeeds in killing King Duncan after hearing the enchantress prognostications. Macbeths grounds for killing King Duncan are legion but most dramatic are greed and an grim desire to go King. He besides wants to do certain that he runs the state as he saw tantrum. Macbeth allows the prognostications to command him and his internal battle is demonstrated by: This supernatural soliciting Can non be badly ; can non be good: if sick why hath it given me earnest of success ( Shakespeare 27 ) . Despite his initial reluctance. he quiets his scruples taking to the barbarous slaying of King Duncan. I have done the title ( Shakespeare 70 ) . Both narratives show similarity between the Director and Macbeth. who are willing to give guiltless lives to obtain the society they want. Desiring and accomplishing the society that is envisioned is ever paralleled with loss and some kind of forfeit. Bernard Marx sacrifices the small regard that he has by conveying John Savage back to the Utopian society. Bernard and John both want the society to be more independent. Fortunately for Bernard and unluckily for the manager. society accepts John and inquiries their ain life style. Bernard believes that life should be precisely the same as John wants it to be I dont want comfort. I want God. I want poesy. I want existent danger. I want freedom. I want goodness. I want wickedness. ( Huxley 237 ) Bernard took a immense hazard in conveying John back to his society because he was put on the lining definite expatriate to Iceland had society rejected John. Macbeth sacrifices his peace of head and self-respect by killing Banquo and seeking to kill Banquos boy Fleance. At the feast Macbeth makes a sap of himself by speaking to the fanciful shade of Banquo. Blood hath been shed now. I the olden clip. Ere human legislative act purged the soft wale ; Ay. and since excessively. muders have been performed Too awful for the ear: the clip has been. That when the encephalons were out. the adult male would decease. And there an terminal: but now. they rise once more. With 20 mortal slayings on their Crowns. And push us from our stools: this is more unusual Than such a slaying is. ( Shakespeare 145 ) Many persons take note of Macbeths unusual behaviour taking them to surmise him of some disgusting title. Unfortunately for Macbeth. Macduff realizes that Macbeth is the true liquidator. This realisation leads to the eventual violent death of Macbeth. This illustrates Macbeths forfeit of his ego regard and his life in order to carry through his prognostication. Many persons are willing to give their psyches in order to go portion of the fanciful universe where merely happiness exists. John Savages female parent. Linda. sacrifices her life by taking excessively much of a drug referred to as haoma. Linda wants to acquire off from the existent universe and come in a universe of felicity. Ever since she had a kid with the Director her life changed for the worse. So the best people were rather determined non to see Linda. And Linda. for her portion. had no desire to see them. The return to civilisation was for her the return to soma. was the possibility of lying in bed and taking vacation after vacation. without of all time holding to come back to a concern or a tantrum of purging. without of all time being made to experience as you ever felt after peyotl. as though you’d done something so disgracefully anti-social that you could neer keep up your caput once more. Soma played none of these unpleasant fast ones. The vacation it gave was perfect and. if the forenoon after was disagreeable. it was so. non per se. but merely by comparing with the joys of the vacation. The redress was to do the vacation uninterrupted. Greedily she clamoured for of all time larger. of all time more frequent doses. Dr. Shaw at foremost demurred ; so allow her hold what she wanted. She took every bit much as 20 gms a twenty-four hours ( Huxley 107 ) Lenina int roduces the drug to Linda every bit shortly as Linda enters the universe after Ford. Linda looses her life and dies at the infirmary because of an overdose of haoma. the drug that is supposed to supply felicity. Lady Macbeth besides sacrifices her peace of head and finally her life so that Macbeth could be King. Lady Macbeth sets up the violent death of King Duncan at the beginning of the novel. Throughout the novel. Lady Macbeth becomes involved in many of the slayings committed by Macbeth. Unfortunately Lady Macbeth experiences a somnambulating unwellness with repeating incubuss of the slaying of King Duncan that could non be resolved. This disease is beyond my pattern: yet I have known those which have walked in their slumber who have died holily in their beds. ( Shakespeare 213 ) . The lives of Linda and Lady Macbeth can besides be viewed as victims of the Utopian societies envisioned by the manager and Macbeth. Freedom and individualism are sacrificed throughout Brave New World and Macbeth in order to accomplish the societies envisioned by the manager and Macbeth. The manager tried to expatriate Bernard merely because Bernard did non accept the norm of the Utopian society. Macbeth kills King Duncan after hearing the witchs prognostications of him being King so that he can run society the manner he wants. Bernard sacrifices his regard by conveying John Savage back place. Macbeth besides sacrifices his regard when he talks to the shade of Banquo. Linda puts her psyche on the line with an overdose of a drug called haoma. Lady Macbeth besides sacrifices her life in order for Macbeth to be King of Scotland. Many persons throughout Brave New World and Macbeth sacrifice their freedom and individuality for the society that they believed in. even if it was non the society that was accepted by the bulk of people. Bibliography Shakespeare. William. Date Modified: 1999. MacbethHuxley. Aldous. Date Modified: 1979. Weather New World

Introduction to sustainable development Research Paper

Introduction to sustainable development - Research Paper Example Generally, sustainable development is a situation where people use the necessary resources to obtain the immediate required needs but does not tolerate any factor that might interfere with the future of the others (Purvis and Alan 82). In short, sustainable development goal is to assist people worldwide attain satisfaction of their basic needs; improve their quality of lives without having to compromise the quality of the upcoming generations. This paper will seek to write a research paper on introduction to sustainable development. It is understandable, in present day; that it will be impossible achieve the â€Å"intergenerational† equity if activities undertaken by some people in some world parts continue to jeopardize the well-being of others living in different parts (Rogers, Jalal, and Boyd 41). Preferably, people should probably refer to â€Å"sustainable† development as balanced and equitable state of affairs (Ukaga and Chris 20). This is because, according to econometrics, for development to continue being sustainable indefinitely, it should be in a position to balance the interests of the many different groups of people, who are among and within similar generations, and attain so at the same time in three crucial interrelated areas. These areas include social, environmental, and economical (Jennifer 84). Therefore, sustainable development is all about equity. Equity in this case refers to comprehensiveness of goals and objectives as well as equality of opportunities of well-being (Dresner 78). Under these three categories, there are so many objectives that sustainable development should put into consideration. For instance, there is objective for full employment, security, equity, stability, efficiency, healthy human environment, conservation of both non-renewable and natural resources among others (United Nations 24). Obviously, it